Reading, Challenge, Strength

I’m headed to ICFA this week, which means that as I write this I’m staring, despairing, at all I have yet to pack and prepare. I’ve meant for a while to write a piece about reading challenges, and it’s always seemed like there was too much to say for me to even start. But I had a long chat with a friend about the subject a while back, and realized I’d told that person much of what I wanted to say already. So, with their permission, I’ll share a somewhat edited version of my side of the chat with you now.

Now, this is my take on reading and reading challenges as a writer. I approach my reading the way fighters approach their diet, or the gym. Barth Anderson has a similar angle on the topic here. People coming from different backgrounds, or coming to reading for different goals, may have different priorities. I recognize that; still, it’s my blog, so I’ll testify about my own experience.

Also NB before you venture below: I’ve left this in its original form for two reasons. First, so you can all understand that this is an internet chat ‘script, and not an essay, which invites different approaches to language, punctuation, etc. Second, the internet chat is its own wonderful and weird literary form. I can’t think of another style of English communication that uses enjambment, for example. Rendering the following in paragraphic prose would be an exercise of adaption, rather than of ‘cleaning up.’ So, here you are.

—CHAT TRANSCRIPT BEGINS—

When I was in China I took along shelves of books to read with me.

Big meaty stuff to last through the winters

So, like, a bunch of early 20th century theology, and Thomas Hardy, and boatloads of Russians

And in the process of not having any actual spoken English around, and reading all these books, which, never read Hardy without heat in the wintertime it will make you want to build a time machine to go back and set Hardy himself on fire

Or at least it did me?

Even though he’s unarguably great etc

Jude the Obscure jesus christ

ANYWAY

So by the time I leave China, 2008, I sound

like Thomas Hardy sieved through a bad translation of Dostoyevsky simmered for a long while with, like, Martin Buber and Heschel and Tillich and stuff

I’m talking about my fiction, understand. Clunky weird sentences. Vocabulary no one should use

So, after arguing with my father about the dubious quality of my latest literary achievement, I decided that for a year I’d only read American fiction. In fact, that I’d only read American realist fiction. No fantasy, no SF, no genre nothing

All the stuff I’d classed as hopelessly boring and recondite, to which my adolescent reaction had been I DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOUR MILL TOWN OR YOUR BUSTED KNEE OR YOUR SON WHO WANTS TO GO TO COLLEGE RATHER THAN REMAIN IN THIS CRUMBLING MILL TOWN YOUR GRANDFATHER BUILT

And some of that stuff? Was trash. And some of it was amazing.

I’d never read any of it before! Like I missed all the classes where it was taught ‘coz I was taking Shakespeare over at the local college!

STEINBECK

Faulkner oh my god, all the stuff nobody I knew down south ever talked about but IS THERE but we’re all so good at not talking about it I barely realized it *was* still there like that until I read Absalom Absalom

Even Poppa Hemmingway, though I don’t like him quite as much as Faulkner coz I agree with Ralph Ellison he kind of cheats & forgets that race is a thing

And it helped! My writing got better. My reading got better. My comprehension got better.

And I fell in love with authors! New authors! Authors I’d completely written off!

But then at the end of this year I realized, shit, I’d read

like a billion dead white dudes

So I thought, I need to read more women! So I started on a Year of Reading Women

North American women, or else I’d just have reread Dunnett and McKinley and all that again

and some of the books I read I couldn’t stand!

but I read Tiptree

and I read Margaret Atwood

who, again, in younger days I’d been all “Margaret Atwood pretending she isn’t writing SF, what the hell”

But Younger Max is a moron

1. Margaret Atwood can write whatever the hell she wants and call it whatever the hell she wants

2. there is no 2

except for 2. publishing is hard and you do whatever you have to and for her? if you can hit that crossover market, and can hit it only by distancing yourself from core genre, which I think was the case in the 80s and 90s? DO IT
hm, sorry, I’m getting a bit carried away here, it’s the old Southern Preacher mode

And I rediscover LeGuin

who MY GOD

Like I’d read her stuff as a kid! So I didn’t know from what!

I was like “That was great, now imma read some David Eddings farmboy fiction”

but then I go back to her and it’s just

*HEAD EXPLODES*

And then I saw some folk online talking about reading writers of color in genre, and I realized that my reading list was overfull of white dudes

and dudettes

and a bunch of 700 year old Chinese guys

So I changed my habits again! Read more Delany, read Okorafor (ALWAYS BE READING OKORAFOR), read Lord (ALSO), read read read.  And so it goes

and again and again the pattern repeats

I’ll start reading people I’m not reading

and some of them I won’t like because whatever reason, and sometimes I’ll be right and sometimes I’ll be wrong
and sometimes when I’m older I’ll realize that younger me was a critical imbecile

like I suspect I might even like Madame Bovary now though when I read it the first time I wanted to throw it out my dorm window on a per-chapter basis

I GET IT FLAUBERT SHE’S READ TOO MANY BOOKS AND THEY’VE SCREWED HER UP AND ALSO POOR PEOPLE IN THE COUNTRY ARE POOR, AND ALSO IN COUNTRY

I love those moments when I recognize young-me was wrong; they remind me of my insufficiency

And each time I’ve intentionally adjusted my reading habits, I’ve found new writers to love

Library’s like a gym. Too many people are New Years Resolutioners when it comes to reading

“Yeah bro I totally lift like three epics a year”

Trainers help. Routines help.

Trainer tells you:

YOUR READING LATS ARE WEAK AND YOU SHOULD FEEL WEAK

WHAT IS THIS CRAP, YOU CAN CURL 90 POUNDS BUT YOU’VE NEVER READ JAMES F—–G BALDWIN?

People doing a reading challenge with good heart will discover muscles they didn’t know they had

Develop reading str_max! Develop reading volume! Develop reading isometric strength! Develop reading speed strength! Develop reading endurance!

Be pretty through strong!

“oh but Trainer I just read books with good stories”

F— YOUR STORIES, JUST READING GOOD STORIES GOT YOU TO THE POINT WHERE YOU CAN SQUAT 500 LBS BUT YOU CAN’T DO A PULLUP

SPECIALIZATION IS FOR INSECTS, MAGGOTS!

SPECIALIZATION IS FOR INSECTS!

And then we drifted off topic. Now, again, this is my take on reading *as a writer*: reading is training, is development, is mat and sparring partner and heavy bag and weight set. Reading is the uncomfortably cut bastard you see doing muscle-ups at the gym and think, god, if I worked harder maybe *that* is possible. Just reading what comes natural is never enough, because what comes natural will stew you in your own juices. Read to grow stronger, faster, sleeker, to hit harder and climb further. And some wild training magic happens when you start: you find you like being strong, and fast, that it’s fun to be sleek, to hit hard, to climb far.

People read for all sorts of reasons, though. Maybe yours are different.

9 Responses to “Reading, Challenge, Strength”

  1. Stephen Dunscombe (@cythraul)

    (Margaret Atwood isn’t American.)

    reply
    • Max

      Canada is in North America. I’ve had Canadians correct me about using American to refer exclusively to US persons. I don’t know if that’s a common complaint though.

      reply
      • Seeker's Quest

        I have never heard of calling Canadians Americans. Canadians call Americans Americans so why would we call ourselves Americans? We’re Canadian. And our literature is different from American Lit.

        reply
        • max

          Those are fair points! I’ve edited the essay to use the term “North American” instead, which I hope removes cause for confusion? Canadian literature is obviously different from American lit—but I think USican and Canadian literature are closer to one another than they are to European and UK literature (a point which could be argued of course), hence my grouping them together for purposes of that particular challenge.

          I think I might use “North American” as a default inclusive term going forward.

        • Danika

          I worked with a Canadian who was always enraged when us Australians referred to those in the States as Americans. America includes two continents. There are a lot of non-US people who live in America.
          You could talk about North-American literature inclusively including both Canadian and US lit.

  2. Vlad

    This is one of my favorite posts of yours! The chat bit feels like stream of consciousness, in a good way.

    reply
  3. thenarrativejunkie

    Hey Max,

    As part of my own training, I’m attempting to read fiction from other cultures & time periods in order to get the feel for what people from then/there cared about. I’m currently reading Icelandic Sagas (which are just brilliant), and I’m eyeing up the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Are there any translations of this you recommend? And also, are there any other pieces of Chinese literature you think more people should read?

    Best, Adam

    reply
  4. Laurence Brothers

    I don’t care how great a prose stylist Thomas Hardy is. One more goddamn word about the furze…. It’s just so grim and glum. Why write exclusively about subfusc unhappy people whose trajectories point inevitably downward? Who wants to read about this? There are so many great classic writers who are at least entertaining to read. But I suppose in his day people eagerly flipped through the pages looking for the racy bits penned by this controversial writer, only to be grievously disappointed….

    In contrast I’m happy with very very slowly reading Swann’s Way just for the quality of the prose, the elaborate delicacy of the narrator’s thoughts, and the precision of his words. Swann and company are not very interesting to me as characters, but at least they’re not morbidly depressing, so I can easily suffer their company while appreciating the words themselves.

    reply

Leave a Reply